Roof Drainage System Considerations – Part 2 - September 2020

By Mike SIlvers, CPRC, FRSA Technical Director
Mon, Sep 21, 2020

The core of that article stressed the importance of not reducing the size of any type of roof drainage. And not to do anything that can cause the roof to hold more water either during or after a rainfall than it was originally designed to hold. I also discussed how far we should have to go in bringing an existing building, which was built in compliance with the code when built, up to current code. Keep in mind that reroofing a building is a level 1 alteration and has a limited scope. Thankfully, we are not required to resize the drainage system to meet the most current code with each subsequent reroof. But what about some of the less obvious examples? Consider an existing building with parapet walls, internal primary drains and no provisions for secondary (emergency overflow) drainage (see picture 1 above). In these situations, several questions arise. First, is the roofing contractor required to add secondary drainage? I will try to answer that question after we review a few related code sections that apply. Read more


Bookmark & Share



Popular tags on this blog

ASCE 7-16 | Business Strategy | Coatings | Convention & Expo | COVID, hurricane season | Cyber Security | Finances | Financial Strategy | Florida Building Code, roofing in Florida, roofing code in Florida | Florida Legislative session | Florida legislature, legislative news | FRSA's Building, FRSA's New Building | FRSA Executive Committee | President's Column | Productivity, Efficiency | Roof Drainage | roofing apprenticeship, roof training, training programs, apprenticeship | Roof Maintenance | Roof Ventilation | Sales | Skylights | STAR Awards | Suicide awareness in the workplace | Sustainable Roofing | Ventilation |
Premium Advertisers
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner